External Link

Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery?

External Link

Navigated robotic assistance results in improved screw accuracy and positive clinical outcomes: an evaluation of the first 54 cases (open access)

Benech et al. J Robot Surg Aug 08 [Epub ahead of print], 2019.

External Link

Stability and load sharing characteristics of a posterior dynamic stabilization device.

Int J of Spine Surg 9(9), 2015

Long-term clinical experience with selectively constrained SECURE-C® cervical artificial disc for 1-level cervical disc disease: results from seven-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled investigational device exemption clinical trial.

Int J Spine Surg 12(3): 377–387, 2018

A novel posterior rod-link-reducer system provides safer, easier, and better correction of severe scoliosis

Spine Deform 7(3):445–453, 2019.

External Link

Laterally placed expandable interbody spacers with adjustable lordosis improve radiographic and clinical outcomes. 1-year clinical and radiographic results.

J Spine S8:001, 2019

A quantitative assessment of the accuracy and reliability of robotically guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement: technique and application accuracy.

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Feb 6 [Epub ahead of print], 2019

External Link

Robotic assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution.

J Robot Surg Feb 28 [Epub ahead of print], 2019.

External Link

Ensuring navigation integrity using robotics in spine surgery

J Robot Surg Apr 15 [Epub ahead of print], 2019.

External Link

Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot assisted spine surgery

J Robot Surg Jul 19 [Epub ahead of print], 2019

External Link

Indirect decompression and vertebral body endplate strength after lateral interbody spacer impaction: cadaveric and foam-block models

J Neurosurg Spine 24(5):727–733, 2016.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.

Neurosurg Focus 43 (2):E10, 2017

Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Neurosurg Focus 44 (1):E8, 2018

External Link

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using expandable technology: a clinical and radiographic analysis of 50 patients

World Neurosurg 90:228–235, 2016

Clinical and radiographic analysis of expandable versus static lateral lumbar interbody fusion devices with two-year follow-up.

J Spine Surg 4(1):62–71, 2018