Research Study

The role of sacral slope in lumbosacral fusion: a biomechanical study

Drazin et al. J Neurosurg Spine 23:754–762, 2015.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel posterior integrated clamp that attaches to an existing posterior instrumentation for use in thoracolumbar revision

Senatus et al. Asian Spine J 7(1):1–7, 2013.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

In vitro biomechanical study of pedicle screw pull-out strength based on different screw path preparation techniques

Moldavsky et al. Indian J Orthop 50(2): 177–182, 2016.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

A novel technique for sacropelvic fixation using image-guided sacroiliac screws: a case series and biomechanical study

Kim et al. J Biomed Res 33(3):208–216, 2019.

Initial single-institution experience with a novel robotic-navigation system for thoracolumbar pedicle screw and pelvic screw placement with 643 screws

Jain et al. Int J Spine Surg 13(5):459-463, 2019.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable interbody device provides indirect decompression through significant disc height restoration

Gentry et al. J Spine 8(4):440, 2019.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

Navigated robotic assistance improves pedicle screw accuracy in minimally invasive surgery of the lumbosacral spine: 600 pedicle screws in a single institution

Wallace et al. Int J Med Robot 16(1):e2054, 2020.

In vitro biomechanical and fluoroscopic study of a continuously expandable interbody spacer concerning its role in insertion force and segmental kinematics

Torretti et al. Asian Spine J12(4):1-610, 2018.

Pedicle screw instrumentation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: biomechanical evaluation of screw configuration with pedicle screws at the level of the fracture

Bolesta et al. Int J Spine Surg 6:200–205, 2012.

Pedicle screw configuration for thoracolumbar burst fracture treatment: short versus long posterior fixation constructs with and without anterior column augmentation

Peters et al. Asian Spine J 8(1):35–43, 2014.

First spine surgery utilizing real-time image-guided robotic assistance

Ahmed et al. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 24(1):13–17, 2019.

Static versus expandable interbody spacers: final 2-year clinical and radiographic results

Frisch et al. J Clin Neurol Neurosurg Spine 4(1):1018, 2019.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

Laterally placed expandable interbody spacers improve radiographic and clinical outcomes: a 1-year follow-up study

Huang et al. Interdiscip Neurosurg 20:100639, 2020.

Study   |   Summary Sheet

Lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw breach rates: a comparison of robotic navigation platform versus conventional techniques

Panchmatia et al. Clin Spine Surg 33(4):E162-E167, 2020.

Comparative effectiveness of expandable versus static interbody spacers via MIS LLIF: a 2-year radiographic and clinical outcomes study

Li et al. Global Spine J 10(8):998-1005, 2020.

Study | Summary Sheet